Specialty EHR & IT

Return to play documentation EHR templates for sports medicine

A concussion clearance is one of the few documents a physician writes that a school, a coach and a parent will all read, and that a lawyer may read later. The record behind it deserves more structure than a paragraph.

9 min read
September 14, 2026
Updated September 14, 2026
Return to play documentation EHR templates for sports medicine
Quick answer
Return to play documentation

Return to play documentation EHR templates should record each step of a graduated protocol with its date and symptom status, and produce a written clearance as an output of that record rather than as a separate letter. State law governs who may clear an athlete, and it varies.

Sports medicine has an unusual documentation burden for a specialty with short visits.

The clinical decision is often straightforward. The record has to satisfy a school district, a state statute, a governing body, and sometimes a family that disagrees with it. That is a lot of weight for a note written between appointments.

The clinical framework itself is well defined and public. CDC’s HEADS UP guidance sets out a six-step return to play progression, with each step typically taking a minimum of 24 hours.

Healthcare IT consulting perspective
The RealitySix steps, one written clearance
⚠️
The Problem
The protocol lives in a paragraph.
Steps described in prose across several notes, so nobody can see which athletes are mid-protocol, and the clearance letter is retyped each time.
🔧
The Solution
Steps as dated rows, clearance as an output.
Record each stage with its date and symptom status, and generate the written clearance from that record rather than composing it separately.
✅
The Resolution
A defensible record and a faster letter.
The progression is visible, the clearance matches it exactly, and a query answers who is where this week.

The graduated protocol, step by step

CDC’s progression is six steps and it is worth having them exactly rather than approximately, because the template should mirror them.

Step one is a return to regular activities such as school, with a green light from the healthcare provider to begin the progression. Step two is light aerobic activity only, described as about five to ten minutes on an exercise bike, walking or light jogging, with no weight lifting. Step three is moderate activity with body or head movement — moderate jogging, brief running, moderate-intensity stationary biking, moderate-intensity weightlifting at less time or less weight than usual. Step four is heavy non-contact activity: sprinting, high-intensity stationary biking, a regular weightlifting routine, non-contact sport-specific drills. Step five is a return to practice and full contact where appropriate for the sport, in controlled practice. Step six is competition.

The guidance adds the rule that makes the record matter: if symptoms return, the athlete stops and the medical provider is contacted, and after more rest and no symptoms the athlete restarts at the previous step. A protocol that can go backwards is a protocol that needs dated rows rather than a narrative.

Key takeaway
  • Six steps, a minimum of 24 hours each, and the ability to step back. That is a table with a date column, not a paragraph.

Symptom tracking between the steps

The progression is driven by symptoms, which means symptom status at each step is the clinical evidence for advancing.

Capture it as a structured value at each stage rather than as a description. What the specific instrument is matters less than that the same one is used each time, because the point is comparison across steps rather than an absolute score. A practice that changes instrument mid-protocol has a record that cannot show progression.

The reason this deserves a field rather than a sentence is the step-back rule. If an athlete regresses, the record should show which step, on what date, with what symptom status — and that is a query, not a re-reading. Getting the instrument and its placement right is ordinary template development work.

Written clearance and who may give it

Here the record stops being clinical and becomes legal, and the requirements are set by state rather than federal law.

New Jersey’s statute, in force since the 2011–12 school year, requires that a student-athlete removed from competition or practice cannot return until evaluated by a physician or other licensed healthcare provider trained in the evaluation and management of concussions, and until they receive written clearance from a physician trained in the evaluation and management of concussions and have completed the district’s graduated return-to-play protocol.

Note the structure: evaluation by one category of provider, written clearance from a physician, and completion of a protocol belonging to the district rather than to you. All three have to be true, and the record should evidence all three. Confirm the current requirement with your own counsel or the state rather than from any summary including this one — these statutes are amended.

Sports medicine team reviewing return to play documentation templates on screen
A protocol stored as prose cannot be reported on. The same information as dated steps answers, in one query, who is mid-protocol this week.

State law varies, and the template has to know it

A practice seeing athletes from more than one state is operating under more than one rule, and the differences are not cosmetic.

Pennsylvania’s law, effective July 2012, requires removal from play on signs or symptoms and written clearance by an appropriate medical professional, with three categories defined: a licensed physician trained in concussion evaluation and management; a licensed or certified healthcare professional so trained and designated by an appropriate licensed physician; and a licensed psychologist with neuropsychological training or postdoctoral training in neuropsychology with specific concussion training.

North Carolina’s Gfeller-Waller Concussion Awareness Act, signed in June 2011, is organised around three areas: education, emergency action and post-concussion protocol implementation, and clearance for return to play or practice, and states that each school should maintain documentation of compliance.

CDC’s clinical guidance makes the same point to clinicians directly: before the season starts, learn the laws or policies of the state, league or governing body. A template that hard-codes one state’s requirement will be wrong for the athlete who crosses a line to play.

Qventive Healthcare

Not sure your clearance documents match your records?

We review how a return to play decision is documented in your practice, check it against what your state requires, and hand you written findings.

The athlete record across a season

One more structural point. A concussion is not always a single episode, and the second is more consequential than the first.

NINDS describes a concussion as a type of mild traumatic brain injury that may take minutes to several months to heal, and notes that a second concussion closely following the first — the second hit phenomenon — can lead to permanent damage or even death in some cases. It adds that children and teens with a sports-related concussion should stop playing immediately and return only after approval by a concussion specialist.

For the record, that means prior concussions have to be visible at the point of assessment rather than discoverable. A header field showing prior episodes with dates does more clinical work than any amount of narrative history, and it is a small build.

  • Build the six steps as dated rows. With a symptom status at each and the ability to step back.
  • Generate the clearance from the record. Not as a separately composed letter.
  • Make the applicable state a field. Multi-state practices need it.
  • Surface prior concussions in the header. Visible, not discoverable.

Qventive provides return to play documentation EHR help for medical practices across New Jersey, usually as part of our sports medicine EHR and IT support and a broader sports medicine practice management engagement.

Because clearance documents go to schools and families rather than staying in the chart, the release path belongs in your HIPAA risk analysis, and it is usually the part nobody has written down.

For scale: CDC reports approximately 214,110 traumatic brain injury-related hospitalisations in 2020 and 68,663 TBI-related deaths in 2023, drawn from the national inpatient sample and its injury statistics system. Most sports concussions never reach a hospital, which is precisely why the outpatient record is the one that has to hold up.

Return to play records: common questions

Does the EHR need to hold the whole graduated protocol?
It needs to hold enough to evidence that the protocol was followed, which in practice means each step with a date and a symptom status. Whether the athlete physically completes the steps under your supervision or under a school athletic trainer varies, and in many cases the progression happens at the school while your practice makes the clearance decision. That does not remove the record obligation; it changes where the information comes from. What you want is a structure that can hold reported steps as well as observed ones, with the source recorded, so a later reader can tell what you saw and what you were told. Practices that document only their own encounters end up with a clearance decision whose basis is not visible in the chart, which is the position you least want to be in if the decision is ever questioned.
Who is allowed to clear an athlete to return?
That is set by state law and it genuinely differs, which is why a template should treat it as a variable rather than a constant. New Jersey requires written clearance from a physician trained in the evaluation and management of concussions, alongside evaluation by a physician or other trained licensed provider and completion of the district’s protocol. Pennsylvania defines three categories of appropriate medical professional including, in defined circumstances, a licensed psychologist with neuropsychological training. Other states differ again, and statutes get amended. For a practice seeing athletes from more than one state, the safe build records which state’s rule applies to this athlete and surfaces the corresponding requirement. Confirm the current position with your own counsel or the state authority rather than from a summary, including this one.
What are the HIPAA implications of sending clearance to a school?
This is the part practices most often handle informally, and it deserves a written process. A clearance document goes to a school, a coach or an athletic director, none of whom are covered entities, which makes it a disclosure requiring a basis. The questions are concrete. What authorisation are you relying on, and is it on file before the document is sent. How is the document transmitted, given that email to a school address and a fax to a shared machine both have obvious exposure. Does the clearance contain more clinical detail than the recipient needs, since a school needs to know the athlete is cleared and what restrictions apply rather than the full assessment. Is there a record of what was sent, to whom and when. In our engagements the authorisation is usually assumed from the fact that a parent asked for the letter, which is not the same as having one.
How should symptom scores be recorded?
As structured values using one instrument consistently, because the clinical value is in the comparison rather than in any single number. Which instrument your clinicians use is their decision and there are several in common use; what matters for the record is that the same one is applied at each assessment and that the score is stored as a number rather than described in prose. Changing instrument partway through a protocol produces a record where progression cannot be demonstrated, which undermines the clearance that rests on it. Store the instrument name alongside the score so a later reader knows what scale they are looking at, and keep the field in the same place in the template at every visit so nobody has to hunt for it during a short appointment.
Should prior concussions change the template?
They should change what is visible, at minimum. NINDS notes that a second concussion closely following a first can lead to permanent damage or death in some cases, which makes prior episodes a safety-relevant fact rather than background history. A field in the record header showing prior concussions with their dates does more clinical work than several paragraphs of history buried in an earlier note, because it is present at the moment the assessment is happening. Whether prior episodes change the protocol itself is a clinical judgement for your physicians rather than a configuration question, and it will depend on timing, severity and the individual athlete. What the system should not do is make the clinician go looking for information that changes the decision.
Ready when you are

Let’s meet

Qventive works with sports medicine practices across New Jersey on protocol templates, clearance documents and athlete records. Thirty years healthcare-exclusive, from our office in Hackensack.

Sources
  1. Six-step return to play progression, each step typically a minimum of 24 hours, with a step back if symptoms return. cdc.gov
  2. New Jersey and Pennsylvania youth sports concussion law requirements for evaluation and written clearance. chop.edu
  3. Gfeller-Waller Concussion Awareness Act: education, emergency action and protocol implementation, clearance. gfellerwallerlaw.unc.edu
  4. Concussion may take minutes to several months to heal; second hit phenomenon can lead to permanent damage or death. ninds.nih.gov
  5. Approximately 214,110 TBI-related hospitalisations in 2020 and 68,663 TBI-related deaths in 2023. cdc.gov
Qventive Healthcare
Healthcare IT consulting and managed services, healthcare-exclusive since 1994. 200 Passaic Street, Hackensack, New Jersey. We serve as a business associate to the practices we support.
AI Assistant Online

Schedule a Consultation

Fill out the form below and we'll get back to you within 24 hours.

Request Sent!

We've received your request and will be in touch within 24 hours.

Something went wrong